you are here: > The brothers and sisters of Jesus > Chapter 04
 
Chapter 4-Christian denial  
     
1.
 In response to this list of immediate blood relatives of Jesus, the Christian churches are unanimous in disputing such facts.
  
2.
 Eastern Christianity, following Eusebius, believes that they were "Joseph's children by his (unrecorded) first wife."
 
3.
 Roman Catholicism, following Mark 15:40, Mark 16:1, John 19:25 and Jude 1 believes with Jerome that they were Jesus' cousins, sons of Mary, the wife of Cleopas, which the Greek word for "brother" or "relative" used in the Gospels would encompass.
 
4.
 Following Hegesippus (about 150 CE), quoted by Eusebius (Ecclesiastical History 3, 11), Cleopas is supposedly the brother of Joseph, and Simon is the cousin of Jesus.
 
5.
 Of course it is one thing to make such claims to try an discredit the existence of blood related brothers and sisters, it is entirely something else when you manage to create false evidence.
  
6.
 "The Protoevangelium of James" a disgraceful work which is untruthfully alleged to have been written by the leader of the Jerusalem church, James is such a document. In this document it claims that Joseph was married previously, and had two sons from it.
 
7.
 Both Christian and Jewish scholars and quick to point out, Aramaic had no word for "cousin," so they claim the word for brother was used in its place. Christian scholars then state in a kind of matter-of-fact way that this multi-use of the word “brother” to also denote cousin would be of little surprise, rather an accepted custom in the language.
  
8.
 Of course, this whole theory goes out the window if one realizes that the first gospels of the Nazarenes were written in Greek, while the false gospels of Paul and the High Priests scribes were written in Aramaic and also Greek.
  
9.
 In Greek, this excuse and subterfuge cannot be used. For a text that states brother or sister means exactly that- blood brother or sister.
  
10.
 The Christian church over time developed yet another trick to make it more difficult to claim as common sense would dictate the true brothers and sisters of Jesus. They started to claim Joseph was of advanced age and died soon after Mary had returned to “Nazareth” (the Christian variation of Nazara).
  
11.
 This wicked lie was made possible by deliberately hiding the identify of Joseph Ha-Rama-Theo, the High King of Ireland in Exile, the direct descendent of King Zedekiah, of the house of cuileann, the "holy Ones" and oldest divine bloodlines of history, the richest man of the whole region and the father of Jesus.
  
12.
 This turned out to be simpler than it sounds. Even though the town Arimathea is pure fiction, the anagram has rarely been contested, nor the many seeming contradictory and non-sensical sections of the new testament if Joseph the Arimathea was not the true father of Jesus.
  
13.
 The Christians went even further, painting Jesus, a royal descendent of both priests and kings to be the son of a poor carpenter, an outrageous misrepresentation but not technically a lie given his father Joseph had completely self-funded the construction of an entire new city of thousands of people called Nazara over ten years.
  
14.
 It is the same as claiming the family that own WalMart are a family of shopping clerks.
  
15.
 Of course, this was only made possible by systematically destroying ever piece of evidence to the contrary.
 
16.
 First of course, it was the Nazarenes, then the Essenes and then any remaining Irish Jewish connections across the Mediterranean.
 
17.
 It also included numerous invasions of Ireland to continue the elimination of all ancient culture and the forcing back to the "Stone Age" any evidence of the former wisdom of the High Kings of Ireland.
 
18.
 In the process, the church inadvertently ensured the survival of the most damning evidence of all, the bloodlines of the ancient kings and direct descendents of the line of David and the line of Jesus.
 

 
 
 

Copyright © 2010 One-Faith-Of-God.Org. All rights reserved.