Why don't Jews believe that Jesus was the Messiah?  

The single most contentious issue between Christians and Jews is the belief by Jews that Jesus was not the moshiach (Messiah). (Christ is an ancient Greek word means literally “anointed one”, so it is not used in discussion of this subject here for clarity).


The most common assumption (and biggest error) made by Christians as to why Jews do not believe Jesus to be the moshiach (Messiah) is that “Jews do not believe Jesus was the son of God and therefore divine.”

  This is not the primary reason. The first and technically valid reason (based on how Paul of Tarsus (St. Paul) wrote the gospels) is that Jesus did not establish his bloodline pedigree to the line of Sadducee Kings from the line of David, all of whom were known as moshiach (Messiah).  
  The Messiah line of David  
  The original and correct meaning of Messiah was simple "anointed one" and in Jewish history referred to the hereditary bloodline of the Sadducee Kings of Israel from the time of David until the last recognized king (Zedekiah) who was executed by Nebuchadnezzar around the 590's BCE.  
  So to be known as the Messiah, was in effect to be of the bloodline of the House of Judah and a rightful King of the Jews. That is why when people have claimed themselves to be a "messiah" over the ages it has been without one ounce of credibility unless they can prove without question their blood heritage to the line of Judah.  
  There is one small technical problem for any person claiming such privilege. History accounts for the Persians executing not only Zedekiah, but every single surviving blood relative of the House of Judah- everyone except his daughter Princess Tamar Tephi who was rescued by Jeremiah himself and taken to Ireland, arriving 593-592 B.C. (some four years after the Destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar),at the Port in the North-East of Ireland, now known as Carrickfergus.  
  It is also recorded that as part of this escape with the last remaining bloodline of the Messiah's, Jeremiah also brought the Stone of Destiny, upon which all Kings were crowned, the sword of Solomon, the harp of David and the Lion standard of Jerusalem and Kings. All of these symbols became the new standards of the Celts and survived various battles and wars until finally most were stolen to become symbols of Britan by the beginning of the twelth century when the Vatican sold all of Ireland and all the Irish as slaves to the English.  
  Princess Tamar married into the lines of the Holly (holy) family, the Cuilleain and subsequent heirs and descendents became the last remaining bloodline, the true Messiah line of the Jews.  
  Given this problem, a second story was concocted by the Sadducee noble families of Syria from around 150 BCE onwards, claiming that some "princesses" somehow managed to free themselves from captivity thanks to a mythical figure known as Ishmael and that he helped them escape and continue the bloodlines.  
  It is on the basis of this fantastic and mythical story that the Sadducee noble families of Syria and Turkey contested themselves as the only remaining and rightful Messianic heirs of the Line of Judah.  
  Paul of Tarsus was a member of one of these families, as was Herod and both historic figures make oblique references to their claimed heritage to David. But what is most interesting is their lack of confidence in making this claim explicit, possibly because it lacked any credibility.  
  Jesus and the line of Judah  
  Christians would remember that the gospels make several fleeting mentions to Jesus being of the line and House of David from his "mother's side". However, all historic accounts of Mary and her family from Qumran is that she was a pure blood Essene, the historic mortal political and philosophical enemies of the Sadducee Priest Kings.  
  Therefore these claims are without credibility and appear more as fumbling attempts to cloud the true heritage of Jesus rather than make it clear.  
  The second anomoly concerning the religion of Christianity founded by Paul and the link of Jesus to the line of Judah are the hereditary lines in the gospels. Neither pedigree matches real historic figures except at the beginning and the end. Christians have claimed over the centuries that these were long "lost" bloodlines, but such claims defy credibility, especially with Jewish scholars.  
  For any credible and historic connection to exist, there would need to be an obvious historic figure around the life of Jesus recognized as a crown prince in exile, with connections back to Ireland.  
  Incredible there is. A key player in the Gospels given the name Joseph of Arimethea. He was said to have been one of the richest men in the world, with mining and land interest in Britain and Ireland, who travelled the world and who had a special and close "family" relationship to Jesus. In fact Christians have long maintained that Joseph (the name of given the the father of Jesus) was a rich uncle.  
  But what is incredible about the title of Arimethea, a place that never appeared to have existed is that it is an obvious anagram for Ha Rama Theo or "His Divine Highness"- a clear and unmistakable title one would expect of a crown prince of the line of David in exile.  
  Why then with such important facts at their fingertips did the Christian founders such as Paul go out of their way to muddy the true messianic heritage of Jesus? For it is on the basis of this confusion and lack of clarity that most jewish scholars have refused to accept Jesus as a true messiah.  
  Fulfilment of the Messianic mission of the Jews  
  There is also a second reason why Jews have traditionally rejected Jesus as their messiah. It is that Jewish scholars believe Jesus simply did not fulfill the mission of the moshiach (Messiah) as it is described and (and properly interpreted) in the biblical passages. (see Jewish belief of Messiah).  

Again, Christians frequently and wrongly assume that when Jews claim their belief that Jesus did not fulfill the mission of the Messiah, they are debating the various passages in New Testament where references are made to events/actions “in fulfillment of prophecy” and whether these events did or did not take place. In actual fact, by jewish religious tradition the principle reason for Jews arguing that Jesus was not the moshiach (Messiah) is that the world has not changed, that Jerusalem has not become a city of the world, that the Temple has not been physically rebuilt, that the world does not yet worship a single G-d as all prophecised that the Messiah would fulfill during the “end days”.


Christians point to many of the same things as not yet happening, but consider these Biblical prophecies will be fulfilled during the “second coming” of Jesus as foretold by the mystic John (also known as the Book of Revelation).


In terms of the divinity of Jesus as the Son of God, it is true that Jews fundamentally consider such ideas a both blasphemous and wrong. Many educated Jewish scholars over the ages have blamed such ideas not on the specific teachings of Jesus, but on “ignorant” translators of Jewish tradition in which many great prophets were honoured by the title of “Son of Man” and in subsequent sloppy translations of the teachings of Jesus, zealous scribes translated the phrase to be “Son of God” thus creating the whole basis of Dogma of divinity.

  The most troubling aspects of the debate is the historic actions of the founders of Christianity not to clarify but to deliberately confuse the blood heritage of Jesus on this vital aspect of his legitimacy as Messiah. This yet to be adequately explained.  

Copyright © One-Faith-of-God.org 2010. All Rights Reserved